33 . Const. P. 114/2025 (S.B.) Mst. Zoya and another V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi Additionally, the main objectives of your police will be to apprehend offenders, look into crimes, and prosecute them before the Courts, also to prevent the commission of crime, and above all, make sure legislation and order to protect citizens' lives and property. The regulation enjoins the police to generally be scrupulously fair on the offender and the Magistracy is to make certain a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Deviations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the legislation and order situation have been the subject of adverse comments from this Court and also from other Courts, Nonetheless they have didn't have any corrective effect on it.
Official database for searching and viewing federal court dockets and case documents. Modest fees implement.
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 5/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi CITATION:2025 SHC KHI forty six SHC Citation: SHC-252218 Tag:I have listened to the acquired counsel for your parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments as being the issues with the matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard on the interim relief application in terms of Section 7(one) of your Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 to hand over possession of your subjected premises for the petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs to be decided through the competent court after hearing the parties if pending as the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer in the Illegal Dispossession case and as far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court must see this component for interim custody of the subject premises When the petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two weeks from the date of receipt of this order.
Acquittal nullifies prior guilt and fortifies petitioners' eligibility for appointment. No juridical impediment to appointment following acquittal. Equivalence of acquittals under compromise and criminal procedure code, as well as the role of "badal-i-sulh" in restorative justice. Distinction between probationary release and acquittal. Probationary release like a legally acknowledged conviction. Read more
Therefore, this petition is found to become not maintainable and is also dismissed along with the pending application(s), and also the petitioners could request remedies through the civil court process as discussed supra. Read more
Generally speaking, higher courts do not have direct oversight over the decreased courts of record, in that they cannot arrive at out on their initiative (sua sponte) at any time to overrule judgments of your decrease courts.
The Roes accompanied the boy to his therapy sessions. When they were informed of the boy’s past, they questioned if their children were Protected with him in their home. The therapist confident them that they'd absolutely nothing to fret about.
In case you find an error during the content of the published opinion (for instance a misspelled name or simply a grammatical error), please notify the Reporter of Decisions. TVW
10. Without touching the merits on the case in the issue of yearly increases within the pensionary emoluments on the petitioner, in terms of policy decision in the provincial government, this kind of once-a-year increase, if permissible in the case of employees of KMC, needs further assessment being made from the court of plenary jurisdiction. KMC's reluctance resulting from funding issues and not enough adoption of provincial increases, creates a factual dispute that cannot be resolved in writ jurisdiction, demanding the petitioner to go after other legal avenues. Read more
The regulation of necessity acknowledged and upheld by Pakistan's highest judicial body has proved an honorable protection for military adventure in civil government.it absolutely was the illegal action called regulation of necessity..
Matter:-DIRECTION Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 255/2025 (S.B.) Zubaida W/O Muhammad Irfan V/S Inspector General of Police (IGP) Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252210 Tag:The law enjoins the police for latest case laws on section 489 f ppc being scrupulously fair to your offender as well as the Magistracy is to guarantee a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the law and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court along with from other courts but they have didn't have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court. The an abundance of this power casts an obligation within the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for just a crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated.
The reason for this difference is that these civil law jurisdictions adhere to some tradition that the reader should be capable to deduce the logic from the decision plus the statutes.[four]
Generally, only an appeal accepted with the court of previous resort will resolve this kind of differences and, for many reasons, these appeals are frequently not granted.
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming on the main case, it is also a properly-recognized proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to achieve a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence during the Stricto-Sensu, apply to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion get support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty of the charge, however, that is topic to the procedure provided under the relevant rules and never otherwise, for that reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-value the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings over the evidence.